om ändåÄr den i vitguld eller?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Notera: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Välkommen till ett uppdaterat Klocksnack.se
Efter ett digert arbete är nu den största uppdateringen av Klocksnack.se någonsin klar att se dagens ljus.
Forumet kommer nu bli ännu snabbare, mer lättanvänt och framför allt fyllt med nya funktioner.
Vi har skapat en tråd på diskussionsdelen för feedback och tekniska frågeställningar.
Tack för att ni är med och skapar Skandinaviens bästa klockforum!
/Hook & Leben
om ändåÄr den i vitguld eller?
Platina?om ändå
Men då hade inte handlarna bestämt sig för att det var ett collectors item.Runt 2016 så prisbumpades a-serie 16520 från 90-89-88-87', det var tider det!
Blir ju mindre kul för de som betalar dessa höga priser den dagen marknaden bestämmer sig för att de inte är så intressanta längre. Det är ju knappats någon PN vi talar om.Men då hade inte handlarna bestämt sig för att det var ett collectors item.
Men då hade inte handlarna bestämt sig för att det var ett collectors item.
If you check my linked Rolexforum ad which was posted two years ago, I did state it’s highly collectible
You mean back then? Of course not. It also quite irrelevant to reflect back to, say, two years ago. Prices change, collectibles change. Back in the day a Sub cost $200.Frågan är ju om nån någonsin betalat över 200k dock
What is your right to withdraw-policy?If you check my linked Rolexforum ad which was posted two years ago, I did state it’s highly collectible
What do you mean?What is your right to withdraw-policy?
I think it's called peruutusoikeus in Finnish.What do you mean?
Not that I know rolexes, but I would guess he meant not yet, as in ever, then or now.You mean back then? Of course not. It also quite irrelevant to reflect back to, say, two years ago. Prices change, collectibles change. Back in the day a Sub cost $200.
Read the forum rulesWhat do you mean?
What is your right to withdraw-policy?
Det står ju i annonsen.Read the forum rules
Ja, precis, KS krav på retur framgår. Jag menade inte KS returpolicy, jag tänkte på ångerrätt enligt lag eftersom det är ett företag som säljer. Hittade ingen info på deras hemsida nämligen. Blev bara nyfiken.Det står ju i annonsen.
"Should the buyer claim that the watch was misrepresented, reclamation for full refund must be done on the day of delivery. "
Med andra ord bör ju rimligtvis två veckors ånger-rätt gälla enligt distansavtalslagen @SamiAJa, precis, KS krav på retur framgår. Jag menade inte KS returpolicy, jag tänkte på ångerrätt enligt lag eftersom det är ett företag som säljer. Hittade ingen info på deras hemsida nämligen. Blev bara nyfiken.
Med andra ord bör ju rimligtvis två veckors ånger-rätt gälla enligt distansavtalslagen
I just didn't realise what the return policy had to do with a value of a collectible piece, so I wanted to clarify what he meant.
The return policy is as by EU law, 14 days upon delivery. That's the standard. What the reclamation part on the ad means is like it says, if the watch is somehow misrepresented, the RECLAMATION needs to be done immediately. What most do not know is that the 14 day return period doesn't mean that any item can be worn and banged around and then returned just before the 14 period is over. The right to return allows to familiarise yourself with the product but it doesn't mean it can be worn for time of 14 days. The reason why the item (watch, sweater, shoes, jacket, stereo equipment and all) needs to be inspected by the buyer right when it arrives is that if the buyer thinks that the item isn't how it was described, it's easy to proof immediately. For example a dent on the case after 12 days have passed is something that most likely is caused by the wearer. For full refund the item always needs to be in exact condition as it was delivered. That's the what the letter of the law says.
I think you're wrong there:I just didn't realise what the return policy had to do with a value of a collectible piece, so I wanted to clarify what he meant.
The return policy is as by EU law, 14 days upon delivery. That's the standard. What the reclamation part on the ad means is like it says, if the watch is somehow misrepresented, the RECLAMATION needs to be done immediately. What most do not know is that the 14 day return period doesn't mean that any item can be worn and banged around and then returned just before the 14 period is over. The right to return allows to familiarise yourself with the product but it doesn't mean it can be worn for time of 14 days. The reason why the item (watch, sweater, shoes, jacket, stereo equipment and all) needs to be inspected by the buyer right when it arrives is that if the buyer thinks that the item isn't how it was described, it's easy to proof immediately. For example a dent on the case after 12 days have passed is something that most likely is caused by the wearer. For full refund the item always needs to be in exact condition as it was delivered. That's the what the letter of the law says.
Har man inte 6 månaders reklamationsrätt enligt konsumentköplagen? Någon jurist här på forumet som kan reda ut del hela?I just didn't realise what the return policy had to do with a value of a collectible piece, so I wanted to clarify what he meant.
The return policy is as by EU law, 14 days upon delivery. That's the standard. What the reclamation part on the ad means is like it says, if the watch is somehow misrepresented, the RECLAMATION needs to be done immediately. What most do not know is that the 14 day return period doesn't mean that any item can be worn and banged around and then returned just before the 14 period is over. The right to return allows to familiarise yourself with the product but it doesn't mean it can be worn for time of 14 days. The reason why the item (watch, sweater, shoes, jacket, stereo equipment and all) needs to be inspected by the buyer right when it arrives is that if the buyer thinks that the item isn't how it was described, it's easy to proof immediately. For example a dent on the case after 12 days have passed is something that most likely is caused by the wearer. For full refund the item always needs to be in exact condition as it was delivered. That's the what the letter of the law says.
Not that I know rolexes, but I would guess he meant not yet, as in ever, then or now.
I think you're wrong there:
"If you bought a good or a service online or outside of a shop (by telephone, mail order, from a door-to-door salesperson), you also have the right to cancel and return your order within 14 days, for any reason and with no justification."
http://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees-returns/index_en.htm
Du har generellt 36 månaders reklamationsrätt i Sverige men här pratar vi om Ångerrätten som är 14 dagar.Har man inte 6 månaders reklamationsrätt enligt konsumentköplagen? Någon jurist här på forumet som kan reda ut del hela?
I understand that but what I mean is that you can't require the customer to do it on the first day. The customer has 14 days to get back to you and say that they want to return the watch.Yes, that 14 days is clearly stated in the reply. BUT if you want to return, it needs to be unworn/in same condition. Please read your quote. It says the goods need to be unworn.
Now, what the meaning of the RECLAMATION part in the ads is, is that it's only TO PROTECT THE CUSTOMER. I'm a watch enthusiast by heart and do understand that when a watch is bought based on pictures, it may feel different on the wrist. This happens all the time at the office too. People come in and try something for the first time only to find out it's not for them. This is very clear and then just return the watch unworn.
Now, if it would happen that the case had a bad dent which wasn't disclosed in the ad, it's only for the good of the customer to report that immediately. If it's done 10 days after delivery, it's usually something that has happened during the 10 day period. If there would be a dent, it's much easier to report it right away and then decide if to return the watch or talk about lowering the price. Again, it's ONLY to protect the customer. Most certainly the right to return does not warrant the customer to damage the goods and then return for full refund.
Yes, that 14 days is clearly stated in the reply. BUT if you want to return, it needs to be unworn/in same condition. Please read your quote. It says the goods need to be unworn.
Now, what the meaning of the RECLAMATION part in the ads is, is that it's only TO PROTECT THE CUSTOMER. I'm a watch enthusiast by heart and do understand that when a watch is bought based on pictures, it may feel different on the wrist. This happens all the time at the office too. People come in and try something for the first time only to find out it's not for them. This is very clear and then just return the watch unworn.
Now, if it would happen that the case had a bad dent which wasn't disclosed in the ad, it's only for the good of the customer to report that immediately. If it's done 10 days after delivery, it's usually something that has happened during the 10 day period. If there would be a dent, it's much easier to report it right away and then decide if to return the watch or talk about lowering the price. Again, it's ONLY to protect the customer. Most certainly the right to return does not warrant the customer to damage the goods and then return for full refund.